A Brief History of The Intelligent Environments Group (IEG)

 

The Birth of Ideas

 

The idea for using AI to manage pervasive computing environments occurred to Vic Callaghan in 1995, while he was spending a sabbatical at the University of Connecticut. During this period he took a week out to visit his friend Keith Prettyjohns in Tucson, Arizona (Keith was his best friend while completing his PhD studies at Sheffield University). In his Tucson home Keith had installed an X10 smart home control system. Keith was an excellent programmer (BCS prize winner) and had programmed his system to do numerous things that amazed and occasionally amused Vic; he especially remembers how KeithÕs system detected visitors outside his house and started an electronic dog barking inside that was completely convincing (all the more impressive given the dog was in reality a recording of Keith impersonating a dog!). While KeithÕs system was smart, it was evident to Vic that the smart functionality came from the programming skills of a very smart guy, Keith, and not the technology. VicÕs research expertise was in intelligent mobile robots and AI, and thus he was hugely puzzled as to why these systems were called ÒsmartÓ as they didnÕt seem intelligent in terms of the robotic technology he had working on. In this, intelligence (or smartness) was rooted in the provision of autonomous machine based reasoning, planning or learning. On returning to Essex University Vic was determined to explore this issue and at the first opportunity engaged two MSc students to start investigating this issue (Simon Robinson "Networking the Home and The Smart Home", 1995/96 & Steve Perry "Towards A Client/Server Computational Model for Domestic Data Networks: A Java Toolkit for Smart-Homes" 1995/96). In summer 2006, one of those students, Simon Robinson, succeeded in building the first smart home test bed at Essex University (based on X10 devices). In October 1996, by good fortune, Vic found himself at a postgraduate induction party, standing next to Graham Clarke (a colleague he had rarely spoken to before then), and to his amazement, Graham turned out to be a trained architect who had an interest in the same ideas, having been inspired by the 20th century pioneers of the movement commonly referred to as Òmodern architectureÓ which boasted people such as Le Corbusier (Charles-ƒdouard Jeanneret) who created the maxim ÒThe house is a machine for living in", a phrase that continues to inspire designers of intelligent buildings and environments.  Further, Graham held a doctorate in psychoanalytic studies and a masters in computing, making him uniquely placed to take the intelligent environments research into unchartered, but intellectually stimulating, territory.  GrahamÕs background coupled with VicÕs robotics expertise became an alliance that shaped and defined a unique area that grew to become the Intelligent Environments Group (IEG), giving it an innovative character and research focus.  GrahamÕs influence was profound, having brought ideas from the modern architecture movement. Within this context Vic found himself, as usual, working in the Essex University Robotics Lab (The Brooker laboratory, that he had founded many years earlier) and whilst there, in a memorable moment, he found himself staring at the outside of one of one the Marvin series of mobile robots, a box-like structure with numerous connected sensors, actuators, processors and other components when he was struck by the similarity of the robot box he was staring at, and the box-like room he was in with its myriad of connected real-time electrical systems, and he wondered if the same techniques used to create robust control of intelligent mobile robots (eg Behaviour based architecture) could be used to create robust intelligent autonomous management systems for intelligent buildings and environments; remembering GrahamÕs description of new architecture they quickly recast this as a variation of Le CorbusierÕs famous phrase "The house is a machine for living in" into  Òan intelligent building is a robot we live insideÓ thereby creating a hypothesis that subsequent research projects would go on to explore. An outcome of this view was that digital homes and other pervasive computing systems are, in fact, essentially identical to mobile robots, simply moving in an abstracted space rather than a physical space and, within this abstracted space, virtually all the mobile robot theorems are valid (a type of implicit duality between robots and pervasive computing spaces!).

 

The IEG Takes Shape

 

In the same year (1996), Graham and Vic began co-supervising MSc students working in this new area and from this pool they got their first PhD student, Susannah Sharples, who began working on a project that sought to explore applications of intelligent buildings to social care applications. The most notable aspect of SueÕs work was that she was the first person to explore the new IEG hypothesis (mobile robots are equivalent to intelligent buildings) by investigating the application of behaviour based architectures (from robotics) to the domain of intelligent buildings; and in the process defined a basic set of intelligent environment behaviours that are still in use today (goal seeking, Safety, Emergency, Manual, Economy, comfort). This project also coined the term "embedded-agent". At the same time in 1996 they started an MSc course in ÒIntelligent BuildingsÓ that later morphed into ÒAmbient Intelligence and Pervasive ComputingÒ, and ran until Vic became emeritus, in 2010. Later in 1998, Graham and VicÕs skills were complemented by the addition of Martin Colley and John Standeven who brought invaluable skills in networking, software, embedded-computing and simulation. Around this time an exceptionally talented PhD student, Hani Hagras, was completing a PhD on the application of Fuzzy logic to mobile robot controllers. Graham and Vic were keen to explore whether HaniÕs fuzzy-logic ideas could be applied to improve the performance of the behaviours based architecture work started by Sue Sharples and so the IEG expanded to include another key member and technology. Since then, Hani has gone on to become the leading exponent on the application of fuzzy logic architectures to intelligent environments.

 

The IEG Experimental Infrastructure

 

In terms of experimental infrastructure, in 1999 the IEG applied for two major grants, an EU IST FP5 Future and Emerging Technologies project, eGadgets and a UK TSB (then DTI) grant ÒPervasive Home Environment NetworkingÓ. This gave rise to the creation of the first IEG testbed, the ÒIntelligent DormitoryÓ (iDorm) and the employment of three key senior research officers; Hakan Duman, Arran Holmes and Jeannette Chin. The iDorm, was built by retrofitting a University office with furniture that is found in a university student dormitory (bed, desk, chair, wardrobe, etc.) and integrating a range of networked devices and technologies so that almost every aspect of the space could be monitored or controlled by the embedded-agents that constantly evolve. To make the technology more widely available, two emulations were created an ÒmDormÓ (a desktop version of the iDorm) and the iWorld (an online simulation). The success of these environments in generating high quality research output, resulted in many more funded projects, including two UK government ÒScience Research Infrastructure FundÓ (SRIF) grants that enabled the building of a highly sophisticated experimental digital home (the intelligent space – iSpace) that was purpose-built and included features that the iDorm lacked such as wired cavity walls / ceilings to hide the pervasive technology and to feign the appearance of a normal home, enabling much longer-term trials to be undertaken (weeks or months). The iSpace was officially opened at the first "Intelligent Environments" conference in 2005 by the ceremonious act of the Essex Vice Chancellor turning on its lights from a wi-fi enabled PDA, viewed by the conference delegates on a projected screen in the building foyer. In 2007, the iDorm was migrated to a larger space where it comprised the previous bed / study room in addition to a living room and control room. Along with the move, the iDorm gained some extra features such as false walls / ceiling and a rich set of media functionality. The iDorm role continued as an experimental space for PhD students until December 2010 when, thanks to another UK SRIF grant, the IEG made the decision to diversify its experimental capability and convert the iDorm into an Òintelligent classroomÓ thereby building on the groups growing collaboration with the Shanghai Jiao Tong University eLearning group which was ongoing since around 2004, collaborating on the design of smart classrooms, affective learning and mixed reality immersive learning spaces. This later activity has recently led to collaboration on a concept labelled intelligent educational pods (ePods) or educational desks (eDesks). Around this time (2009), Ken Guild joined the group and the pervasive computing experimental architecture was expanded to encompass the entire university, with the infrastructure taking the name, iCampus.

 

This then brings our brief overview of the IEG to the current date; October 2011. In writing this brief overview we are conscious that we have skipped over many significant individual contributions. However, as time allows we hope to add more detail to this account and, if we have omitted any significant milestones, or overlooked mentioning people, we apologise but earnestly request that you email us so we can correct any omissions or inaccuracies; only from your input, can we make this record more accurate and useful.

 

  The are also a number of videos showing various milestones in the early history of the IEG at Essex. For an insight into the current research, look at the IEG web site and the Digital Lifestyles Centre web site.

Finally, we are pleased to acknowledge the following people who have at some point of their life been members of the IEG; without you the IEG would not be the success it has been. If you spot any omissions to this list (or if you have been left off), we apologize profusely, and ask you to email us so we can make immediate corrections:

 

1.   Jisnu Basu

2.      Filiz Cayci

3.      Gustavo de Souza

4.      Hakan Duman

5.      Catherine Fung

6.      Arran Holmes

7.      Gillian Kearney

8.      Adam King

9.      Karin Leichtenstern

10.  Yong Li

11.  Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez

12.  Anthony Pounds-Cornish

13.  Angelica Reyes

14.  Anuroop Shahi

15.  Sue Sharples

16.  John Standeven

17.  Mohammad Al-Mulla

18.  Matt Ball

19.  Vic Callaghan

20.  Jeannette Chin

21.  Graham Clarke

22.  Martin Colley

23.  Susi Daryanti

24.  Marc Davies

25.  Faiyaz Doctor

26.  James Dooley

27.  Simon Egerton

28.  Michael Gardner

29.  Kenneth Guild

30.  Hani Hagras

31.  Martin Henson

32.  Xristos Kalkanis

33.  Yevgeniya (Jenya) Kovalchuk

34.  Udo Kruschwitz

35.  Malcolm Lear

36.  Enrique Leon

37.  Dana Pavel

38.  Fernando Rivera-Illingworth

39.  Muneeb Shaukat

40.  Liping Shen

41.  Rob Stacey

42.  Elias Tawil

43.  Christian Wagner

44.  Liu Yun

45.  Minjuan Wang

46.  Xinyi Jiang

47. Hsuan-Yi (Jen) Wu

47.  Victor Zamudio

48.  Xiao Xia Zheng

49. Tongzhen Zhang

 

4th October 2011