... \let
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...2
Note that because size distributions are typically skewed, the proportion of above-average-size programs, $ \phi_>$, is not necessarily 0.5. For example, in a population containing 5 programs of size 1, 4 of size 2, 3 of size 3, 2 of size 4 and 1 of size 5, $ \phi_> = \frac 2 5$.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...PoliEtAl-tab:successRates.3
While the results reported in Table .-2 provide a useful indication of relative performance differences, they were obtained for one particular definition of success: that the fitness is no greater than 1. Naturally, different definitions of success may produce different results.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...4
In fact, preliminary attempts at solving the BCI problem showed that we could not even perform full scale runs without bloat control.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.